Expert review with performance specs, running costs, and finance options.
The Golf is a well-established premium hatchback known for its quality, practicality, and driving dynamics.
The Golf offers a more refined driving experience with a focus on comfort and technology. It features a high-quality interior with advanced infotainment systems, but the Puma ST is sportier and more engaging to drive.
The Golf is generally more expensive than the Puma ST, especially in higher trims, due to its premium positioning and brand reputation.
The Golf typically has slightly better fuel economy and reliability ratings, but servicing costs can be higher. Insurance premiums may also be higher compared to the Puma ST.
The 208 is a stylish supermini that appeals to younger buyers looking for a blend of design and efficiency.
The 208 has a modern interior with a unique design and good tech features, but it lacks the sporty edge of the Puma ST. The driving experience is more comfort-oriented.
The 208 is generally less expensive than the Puma ST, making it a budget-friendly option in the supermini segment.
The 208 offers competitive fuel economy and lower insurance costs, but may not match the Puma ST's reliability in some reports.
The Clio is a popular choice in the supermini segment, known for its value and practicality.
The Clio provides a comfortable ride with decent tech features, but it lacks the sporty performance and handling of the Puma ST. The interior quality is good but not as premium as the Golf.
The Clio is typically less expensive than the Puma ST, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
The Clio generally offers good fuel economy and lower running costs, but reliability can vary, and insurance is often cheaper than the Puma ST.
The Ford Puma ST (2020 onwards) stands out in its class for its sporty performance and engaging driving experience, competing well against rivals like the Golf, 208, and Clio.