Expert review with performance specs, running costs, and finance options.
A direct competitor to the Mustang, known for its aggressive styling and performance-oriented variants.
The Camaro offers a more refined interior and advanced tech features compared to the Mustang, but some may find the visibility and rear seat space less accommodating.
The Camaro is generally priced similarly to the Mustang, with some variants being slightly more expensive depending on the engine choice.
Fuel economy is comparable, but the Camaro may have slightly higher insurance costs due to its performance image. Reliability ratings are similar, but servicing costs can vary based on the engine.
Positioned as a muscle car with a retro design, appealing to those who prioritize power and spaciousness.
The Challenger offers a more spacious interior and trunk compared to the Mustang, but it may not handle as sharply. Tech features are competitive, but the interior quality can feel less premium.
Typically, the Challenger is priced similarly to the Mustang, but higher trims can be more expensive due to larger engine options.
Fuel economy is generally lower than the Mustang, especially with the larger engines. Reliability is average, and insurance costs can be higher due to its muscle car status.
A sports car that emphasizes performance and driving dynamics over practicality.
The 370Z is more focused on driving experience with a sportier feel, but it lacks the modern tech and interior space found in the Mustang. Cabin quality is good but not as refined.
The 370Z is generally less expensive than the Mustang, especially in base trims, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious performance seekers.
Fuel economy is slightly better than the Mustang, but reliability is average. Insurance and servicing costs are typically lower, making it a more economical choice overall.
The Ford Mustang (2015 onwards) competes strongly in the muscle car segment, offering a blend of performance, style, and technology that appeals to a wide range of buyers.